🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing number of nations are considering parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and apps are "taking away our kids' innocence". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to approve a bill lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "addictive" nature of these services, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a useful starting point," said a leading MEP supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any action must be "based on robust research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation founded by the family of a teenager who died after viewing harmful online content argues that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and suitable for minors," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the regional level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further access requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some politicians to mimic this example, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Beyond Europe and the US, additional nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies adopt a more cautious position. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The body highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this worldwide debate evolves, the steps of this nation and others show that governments internationally are less and less prepared to wait for the industry to self-regulate.